Category: Charging Order Protections


By , May 12, 2014 5:43 pm

The LLC acts of at least two states do provide qualified charging order protections to members of single-member LLCs—namely, Florida and New Hampshire.  I think there are strong policy reasons why all LLC acts ought to so provide.

The charging order provisions in the NH act apply to members of both single-member LLCs and multi-member LLCs, but with the following qualification with respect to members of single-member LLCs (under Section 126, VI(a), which I drafted):

If a judgment creditor shows to the satisfaction of a court of competent jurisdiction that distributions under a charging order in respect of the limited liability company interest of a debtor-member of a single-member limited liability company will not satisfy the judgment within a reasonable time, a charging order shall not be the sole and exclusive remedy by which the judgment creditor may satisfy the judgment against the member.


By , January 11, 2011 8:50 am

In my LLC practice, I often run across LLCs whose ultimate owners hold their LLC memberships through single-member LLCs.  They do this because they think that they are obtaining two significant benefits—greater anonymity as LLC owners and an extra layer of statutory liability protection.

EXAMPLE.  Arthur Able and Bill Baker are equal members of AB, LLC.  AB, LLC, in turn, holds real estate with a fair market value of $1 million.  Arthur holds his AB membership directly in his own name.  Bill holds his through a single-member LLC named “Cosmic Holdings, LLC,” of which he is the sole member.

I think the above ownership structure creates a serious trap for Bill.  One of major benefits of holding property in an LLC is that all U.S. LLC acts except that of Pennsylvania provide LLCs and their members with statutory charging order protections.  (And I understand that Pennsylvania case law provides charging order protections for Pennsylvania LLCs and their members.) 

I will write about charging order protections at greater length in future posts.  However, in essence, LLC statutory charging order provisions provide that if a creditor holds an unsatisfied judgment against a member of a multi-member LLCs on the basis of a claim unrelated to the LLC’s business:

  • The creditor may obtain a lien (a “charging order”) against the LLC on the debtor-member’s right to receive distributions of LLC profits, requiring the LLC to distribute to the creditor any LLC profits it would otherwise distribute to the member to the extent of the judgment.
  • However, the creditor may not levy on the debtor-member’s voting rights or other management rights in satisfaction of the claim.

In my view, the fact that LLC statutes provide for charging order protections and that corporations do not is the single greatest business organization law advantage of LLCs over corporations.    

To explain:  In the above example, Bill, as noted, holds his ownership in AB through a single-member LLC.  What this means as a practical matter is that if Bill accidentally but negligently runs over and kills a brain surgeon on business unrelated to the LLC and the brain surgeon’s estate obtains a $20 million judgment against him, the estate can levy on his single-member LLC membership; it can obtain Bill’s voting rights; and, by exercising deadlock voting power, it can force the LLC to sell its assets and distribute Bill’s share of the proceeds to the estate.  This is because charging order protections only protect LLC members; they do not protect the members of single-member LLCs that are members of multi-member LLCs.

By contrast, assume that Arthur is the AB member accidentally killing the brain surgeon.  In this situation, charging order protections will enable the estate to obtain a charging order against AB, LLC; but, because Arthur holds his membership in AB directly, the estate cannot obtain Arthur’s voting rights and thus cannot force AB’s dissolution.

In short:  Think long and hard before advising your LLC formation clients to hold their memberships in multi-member LLCs through single-member LLCs.  First, your client will thereby lose charging order protections.  Second, as a practical matter, he won’t need a second liability shield; so why bother with a single-member LLC?  Third, in any law suit, the “anonymity” he thinks he will obtain through his single-member LLC will quickly turn out to be worthless.


By , July 5, 2010 11:22 am

On June 29, 2010, I taught for National Business Institute (“NBI”) a 90-minute national teleconference seminar on LLC charging protections.   About 82 lawyers and other professionals attended the seminar.  During the seminar, I discussed, among many other topics, the recent decision of the Florida Supreme Court in FTC v. Olmstead.  I revised the sentence outline for the seminar shortly before teaching it.  The revised outline is 22 pages long and has two exhibits.  You can access and download the outline here.